Third-Party Technical Supervision Services — Independent Quality Control for Your Tech Investments
Covering Software Development, System Integration, Digital Transformation—Solve "Vendor Dominance, Quality Risks, Uncertainty"
Addressing enterprise pain points like "opaque vendor services, misaligned requirements, hidden vulnerabilities, and frequent delays/budget overruns" in tech projects, we provide "independent third-party" technical supervision. Not involved in development—we act as your "rights representative" to intervene in the entire process: requirement review, solution audit, process monitoring, and acceptance inspection. Leveraging 10+ years of experience and industry standards, we ensure project quality, on-time delivery, and cost compliance—making your tech investment "valuable, stable, and risk-free".
Core Service Types
4 Core Supervision Directions for Full-Cycle Control
👉 Full-Cycle Development Supervision:• Content: - Progress Monitoring:Weekly check against plan (code commits/feature completion) to warn of delay risks - Quality Control:Random code quality checks (standards/vulnerabilities), function testing (vs. requirements), data security (encryption compliance) - Coordination:Neutral bridge between enterprise and vendor to resolve requirement changes/technical disputes• Case:Supervised ERP development for a manufacturer—discovered vendor "substituted tech components", required correction, 50% more stable system, avoiding post-launch losses
👉 Project Acceptance Supervision:• Scope:Function acceptance (verify requirement alignment), performance testing (stress/response speed vs. standards), security audit (penetration testing/compliance with Cybersecurity Law)• Guarantee:Quantified acceptance criteria (e.g., ≥98% function compliance), rejected if unqualified—found 3 privacy leaks in a healthcare APP, approved only after fixes, avoiding compliance risks
👉 Specialized Risk Supervision:• Directions:Data migration supervision (integrity/consistency), system integration supervision (compatibility/data interoperability), legacy system upgrade supervision (risk assessment/rollback plan)• Case:Supervised core system upgrade for a financial institution—predicted "long downtime risk", optimized plan cut switch time from 8h to 2h, no business interruption
Core Service Advantages
5 Guarantees vs. "Vendor Self-Supervision"
Absolute Independence:No cooperation with vendors—only represent your interests, objective conclusions without conflicts of interest;
Professional Authority:Supervisors with 10+ years experience (Java/PHP/big data/AI) and certifications (PMP/CISSP), understanding both tech and business needs;
Standardization:Based on GB/T 19668 (IT Service Supervision Standard) and proprietary "108-item supervision checklist"—no "subjective judgment";
Risk Prediction:Leverage "industry fault database" (5000+ project risks) to identify ≥90% common risks (e.g., vendor incompetence);
Rights Protection:Full process documentation (meeting minutes/audit reports)—free correction suggestions if issues are missed, providing evidence for disputes
Supervision Process
5-Step Standardized Process
Enterprise Needs Communication → Supervision Plan Development (scope/standards/timeline) → Contract Signing → Full-Cycle Supervision Execution (stage reports) → Acceptance Assistance (standards/companionship)
Client Success Stories
Industry Supervision Cases
👉 Internet: Supervised social APP development—found missing privacy features in requirement review, avoided Cybersecurity Law penalties, 20% higher user retention;
👉 Healthcare: Supervised hospital outpatient system integration—discovered data sync delays, optimized to cut patient wait time by 40%, passed acceptance on first try;
👉 Manufacturing: Supervised MES development for an auto parts firm—kept budget within 5% overrun, 7 days early delivery, 100% function compliance;
👉 Retail: Supervised private-domain e-commerce platform—found payment security leaks in acceptance, avoided potential 1M RMB losses after fixes
Free Risk Assessment
Book a free tech project risk check (new clients only), experts identify potential issues